Legal Opinion

State v. Snoderly

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1940No. 6657PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.

Appellant Maud Waldridge owned certain premises located in Twin Falls comity about a mile west of Buhl on U. S. Highway No. 30. Appellants Harry Snoderly and Charles Inderwies operated thereon a “Bavarian Beer Garden.” January 10, 1938, the State of Idaho filed a complaint in the district court of that county, under the provisions of sections 57 and 59 of the Idaho Liquor Control Act (Sess. Laws 1935, chap. 103, p. 222) charging appellants Snoderly and Inderwies with operating (with the approval, consent and authorization of appellant Waldridge) a public nuisance contrary to and in violation…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Smith v. Faris-Kesl Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Davenport v. BurkeIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hutchinson v. Watson Slough Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Bedal v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Brown v. HardinIdaho Supreme Court · 1917

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. GilbertIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Checketts v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State v. SedamIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Reynolds Irr. Dist. v. SproatIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Summerfield v. PringleIdaho Supreme Court · 1943

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API