Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 23, 1968PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
A detailed recital of all the facts in this case is unnecessary. The plaintiff is the owner of a shorefront lot in Branford on which there are a dwelling house and a guest house. The defendant Walter Kreske, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, is the owner of the adjoining lot on which there are a dwelling house and an outbuilding. The zoning regulations provide that the maximum floor area of a building on either of these lots may not exceed 30 percent of the lot area. The defendant’s house was a nonconforming use since the bulk floor area exceeded the maximum size by 7 percent. In…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Krejpcio v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Davis v. MargolisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- I. R. Stich Associates, Inc. v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Hickey v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Farkas v. HalliwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sheridan v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Nader v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Beckish v. ManafortSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Walls v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Gladysz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.