Legal Opinion
Aetna Health, Inc. v. Kirshner
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 16, 2006No. CIV.3:05CV864 (JBA)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO REMAND [Doc. # 8]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Aetna Health, Inc.,,* and Aetna Life Insurance (collectively “Aetna”) filed this suit against defendants Mark Kirshner, a chiropractor, and several associated doctors and medical corporations (collectively “Kirshner”), in state court on June 9, 2004. Defendants answered and filed counterclaims against Aetna on May 11, 2005. By notice dated May 31, 2005 [Doc. # 1], Aetna removed the case to federal court, alleging that Kirshner’s counterclaims were preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). Kirshner then…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield v. East Brunswick Surgery CenterDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Blast All, Inc. v. IngelsbyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- State of Connecticut v. EIDP, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2024