Legal Opinion
State of Connecticut v. EIDP, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 17, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00239Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT STATE OF CONNECTICUT, Plaintiff, No. 3:24-cv-239 (SRU) v. EIDP, INC., et al., Defendants. ORDER ON MOTION TO REMAND The State of Connecticut (“the State”) brought this parens patriae suit in Connecticut Superior Court against several chemical manufacturers whose activities have allegedly caused widespread environmental contamination across the state. Before the Court now is the State’s motion to remand its claims to Connecticut state court. For the reasons set forth below, the State’s motion is granted. I. Background On January 25, 2024,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Watson v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.