Legal Opinion
Blast All, Inc. v. Ingelsby
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 8, 2021No. 3:21-cv-00124Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BLAST ALL, INC., Case No. 3:21-cv-00124 (KAD) Plaintiff, v. ERIK INGELSBY, DANIEL BOWSER, April 8, 2021 Defendants. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND (ECF NO. 8) Kari A. Dooley, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Blast All, Inc. (“Blast All,” or the “Plaintiff”) commenced this action in the Superior Court for the State of Connecticut against Defendants Eric Ingelsby (“Ingelsby”) and Daniel Bowser (“Bowser,” and, collectively, the “Defendants”) asserting a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.