Legal Opinion
E. R. Squibb & Sons v. Mallinckrodt Chemical Works
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 16, 1934No. 9699PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Circuit Judge.
This is an action for infringement brought by the assignee of Patent No. 1,370,-865, issued to Frederick Westerbeek. From a decree determining infringement of claims 1 and 2, defendant appeals.
At the beginning, we are faced with the contention by appellee that the specification of errors is insufficient to present any matter here. The assignments of errors set forth thirteen separate assignments. Under the heading of “Assignment of Errors” and evidently having in mind the requirement of Rule 24 (Fourth) of this court, appellant says:
“The formal assignment of errors is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Lincoln v. Sun Vapor Street-Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Hard & Rand, Inc. v. Biston Coffee Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Lahman v. Burnes Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- City of St. Paul v. Certain Lands in City of St. Paul, Minn.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Mason v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Brookside Theatre Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Chicago, B. & QR Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Anderson v. Federal Cartridge CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Kincade v. MiklesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.