Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Federal Cartridge Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 17, 1946No. 13312PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Circuit Judge.
This was an action to recover overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and attorney fees alleged to be due by reason of the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A., §§ 201-219. By its answer defendant pleaded that plaintiffs qualified as exempt employees and for that reason were not within the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties will be referred to as they were designated in the trial court. There were a great number of individuals named as plaintiffs, but on the suggestion of the court twelve representative cases…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- McCandless v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Carroll v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Burger King CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Benjamin Dranow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Brookside Theatre Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Diapulse Corporation of America, Also Known as the Diapulse Manufacturing Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Glynn Douglas, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Argo-Tech Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.