Legal Opinion

United States v. Chicago, B. & QR Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 10, 1936No. 10250PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARIS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant brought this action to condemn a floodway easement on and over a part of the right of way and railroad embankment of appellee, which runs along the Mississippi river just west of and up the river from the town of Hastings, Minn. By the construction by the United States of a dam in said river, near Hastings, the waters thereof will be raised at times to a point 699 feet above the Memphis datum, and ordinarily will stand at 696.4 feet above such datum. This will result, when the dam is holding "back the contemplated maximum depth of water, in flooding the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  2. Karlson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  3. United States v. 101.88 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Fire Association of Phila. v. Allis Chalmers Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1955
  5. United States v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API