Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Moore

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided April 25, 2000No. 17-01530PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JEFFREY R. HUGHES, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Debtors in the above-captioned Chapter 13 proceedings have filed amendments to their confirmed plans to add creditors who were not listed in the Debtors’ original schedules and who otherwise did not file proofs of claim. Presumably, the purpose of these proposed amendments is to include these creditors within the discharge provided by 11 U.S.C. § 1328.

The question before the court is whether Section 1329, which controls post-confirmation amendments to Chapter 13 plans, permits this type of amendment. The court concludes that it does not. However,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re HausladenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
  2. Williams v. First National Bank, Rosedale, Mississippi (In Re Williams)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1989
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Judkins (In Re Judkins)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1993
  4. In Re WeissmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  5. In Re RodriguezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1998

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re HudsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
  2. Aubain v. LaSalle National Bank (In Re Aubain)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  3. In Re TownsvilleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. In Re PlummerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2007
  5. In Re ThaxtonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API