Legal Opinion
In Re Hausladen
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 24, 1992No. 19-30090PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ALLOWING CLAIMS
ROBERT J. KRESSEL, Chief Judge.
These Chapter 13 cases came on for hearing on objections by the trustee to several claims. Because the trustee’s objections raise the identical issue 1 in each case and because of the importance of the issue, the court is deciding the objections en banc. See Local Rule 109. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157(a) and Local Rule 201. These are core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).
FACTS
The debtors all filed petitions under Chapter 13. Meetings of creditors were scheduled pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 341 and Rule…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- In Re Pacific Atlantic Trading Co., Debtor. United States of America, Claimant-Appellant v. Robert F. Towers, Trustee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- In Re ZimmermanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1993
- In Re John R. Chavis and Betty E. Chavis, Debtors. United States of America, Internal Revenue Service v. John R. Chavis and Betty E. ChavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- In Re RagoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- In Re BaileyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1993
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.