Legal Opinion
In Re Plummer
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided November 30, 2007No. 05-72087PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARY P. GORMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
In this two and one-half year-old Chapter 13 case, John and Joyce Plummer (“Debtors”) seek authorization to amend their Schedule F to add previously unscheduled pre-petition 1 creditors and to extend the claims bar date in order to give the added creditors the opportunity to file claims so that their debts to the added creditors will be discharged upon completion of Debtors’ Chapter 13 Plan. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that, although the Debtors are free to amend their schedules, the claims bar date cannot be extended, and their…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In the Matter of Daniel J. YONIKUS and Carolyn S. Yonikus, Debtors. Appeal of Daniel J. YONIKUSCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- In the Matter of Ronald J. Witkowski, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- In Re Francis A. Arnold, A/K/A Frank Arnold, Debtor. Francis A. Arnold, A/K/A Frank Arnold v. Ruth WeastCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- In Re CashUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1985
- United States v. Trembath (In Re Trembath)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Weatherford v. Timmark, Carey Holdings Inc. (In Re Weatherford)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2009
- In Re WetzelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2008
- In re SandfordUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- In Re SchusterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- Smith v. United States (In Re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.