Legal Opinion
Temple v. Meyer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 26, 1988No. 13383PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
The plaintiff, W. Scott Temple, commenced
this action against the defendant, Geri Meyer,1 originally seeking custody of Timothy Daniel Temple, the defendant’s minor child. The plaintiff subsequently amended his complaint to seek only visitation rights with the child. The trial court rendered judgment denying the plaintiff visitation rights. The plaintiff has appealed. We find no error.
The facts relevant to this appeal are as follows. The plaintiff and the defendant met in June, 1982, and began living together in September, 1982. They separated in March or April of 1984 and resumed living…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Gallo v. GalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Spells v. SpellsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Ubysz v. DiPietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Michaud v. WawruckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Castagno v. WholeanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Lehrer v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- D'Angelo v. McGoldrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.