Castagno v. Wholean
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether, pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-59,1 the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction to entertain a petition by grandparents for visitation rights with their minor grandchildren when the grandchildren and their parents were not involved in any case or controversy currently before the court and there was no claim that the family unit was no longer intact. We conclude that although *338§ 46b-59 lacks specific language imposing any threshold requirement, established rules of statutory construction, the context of the statute and its legislative history…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Elliott v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Roth v. WestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Ramos v. Town of VernonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Hoff v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.