Legal Opinion

Spells v. Spells

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1977No. 64PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in denying his petition for visitation with his stepchildren. He also argues that the lower court erred by terminating the hearing prematurely. We agree with the latter contention and, therefore, reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 1

Appellant and appellee, who had two children fathered by another man, were married on January 23, 1971. No children resulted from the instant union. The children lived with appellee and appellant for seven or eight months prior to the marriage and for its duration. On…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Grillo v. ShusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Holschuh v. Holland-MoritzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Parikh v. ParikhSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Com. Ex Rel. Myers v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Stapleton v. Dauphin County Child Care ServiceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. T.B. v. L.R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. T.B. v. L.R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. J.A.L. v. E.P.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. In Re the Marriage of AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. J.A.L. v. E.P.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API