Legal Opinion

Hartness International, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Simplimatic Engineering Co., Appellant/cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 12, 1987No. Appeal 86-1037, 86-1086PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD S. SMITH, Circuit Judge.

In this case, Hartness International, Inc. (Hartness International), sued Simplimatic Engineering Co. (Simplimatic) for infringement of two patents, No. 3,788,034 (’034) and No. 3,911,647 (’647), both relating to devices used to load bottles into cartons. The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia held: 1 (1) the ’034 patent was not procured by inequitable conduct and it remains enforceable; (2) claims 1, 2, and 7-11 of the ’034 patent are not invalid for obviousness, but claim 3 (dependent on claim 1) of the ’034 patent is invalid…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Atlas Powder Company v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company and Alamo Explosives Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Robert Conroy v. Reebok International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  2. Wahpeton Canvas Co. v. Frontier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  3. Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corporation, Visa International Service Association, Inc., Visa Usa, Inc. And Crestar Bank, Inc., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  5. Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Opticon, Inc., and Opto ElectronicsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API