Legal Opinion

Wahpeton Canvas Co. v. Frontier, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 20, 1989No. Nos. 88-1305, 88-1332 and 88-1333PublishedCited by 252 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

Wahpeton Canvas Company (Wahpeton) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota that Frontier, Inc. (Frontier), and Steven C. Schmeichel and Charles M. Schmeichel, d/b/a Agri Cover (Agri Cover), did not infringe Wahpeton’s U.S. Patent No. Re. 31,746 (’746). Frontier cross-appeals a judgment entered on directed verdict on its counterclaims. Agri Cover filed a “cross-appeal” to challenge a ruling that certain evidence was inadmissible. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

BACKGROUND

Introduction

On April 20, 1982…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Howard A. Fromson v. Western Litho Plate and Supply Co. And Bemis Company, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. The Laitram Corporation and Intralox, Inc. v. Cambridge Wire Cloth CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by252 opinions

  1. Carroll Touch, Inc. v. Electro Mechanical Systems, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  2. Becton Dickinson and Company v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Associates D/B/A Slazenger, and Dunlop Slazenger Corporation AKA Dunlop Sports CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  4. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Chemque, Inc. (Formerly Known as Chemque Canada, Ltd.) and Thomas & Betts Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  5. Braun Inc. And Braun Aktiengesellschaft, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Dynamics Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API