Legal Opinion
Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 26, 1991No. 90-1002, 90-1021PublishedCited by 144 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIES, Chief Judge.
SmithKline Diagnostics, Inc. (SKD) appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, SmithKline Diagnostics Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corp., 12 USPQ2d 1375 (E.D.Tex.1989), awarding SKD $625,-461.06 against Helena Laboratories Corporation to compensate for Helena’s infringement of SKD’s U.S. Patent No. 4,365,970 (the ’970 patent). The award was based upon a 25% royalty on the selling price of Helena’s infringing product plus interest. SKD appeals, urging that the district court wrongly denied SKD a greater amount calculated on the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Wms Gaming Inc. v. International Game TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Micro Chemical, Inc. v. Lextron, Inc. And Turnkey Computer Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Electro Medical Systems, S.A. v. Cooper Life Sciences, Inc., Dentsply International Inc., and Dentsply Research & Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.