Legal Opinion

Porco v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 7, 2003PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

Daniel Porco, pro se, petitions for review of the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) that affirmed the decision of the referee determining that Porco was ineligible for benefits under Section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex.Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. § 802(b). The Board determined that Porco failed to prove that his voluntarily leaving his position with Electronic Merchant Systems (EMS) was for cause of a necessitous and compelling nature. Porco contends that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Pallet v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Arena v. Packaging Systems Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Walsh v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Western & Southern Life Insurance v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Serrano v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. First Federal Savings Bank v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. C. Berg-Moton v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API