Porco v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SMITH-RIBNER.
Daniel Porco, pro se, petitions for review of the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) that affirmed the decision of the referee determining that Porco was ineligible for benefits under Section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex.Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. § 802(b). The Board determined that Porco failed to prove that his voluntarily leaving his position with Electronic Merchant Systems (EMS) was for cause of a necessitous and compelling nature. Porco contends that the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Pallet v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Arena v. Packaging Systems Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Walsh v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Western & Southern Life Insurance v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Serrano v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- First Federal Savings Bank v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- C. Berg-Moton v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.