Udvari v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*322 OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
We must determine whether there is substantial evidence to support the termination of the claimant’s workers’ compensation benefits. The Commonwealth Court held that there is not. We reverse.
Appellee, Susan Udvari, was employed as a lead flight attendant by Appellant, USAir Inc. On January 15, 1992, Udvari sustained neck and shoulder injuries when an aircraft in which she was working ran into a snow bank while attempting to depart. Pursuant to a notice of compensation payable, Udvari received workers’ compensation benefits. On February 8, 1993, USAir filed a petition…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Williams v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Bloom v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Gumro v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by151 opinions
- Hoffmaster v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Senco Products, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Thompson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Elberson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Coyne v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Lewis v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.