Legal Opinion

Udvari v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 24, 1997No. 46 W.D. Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 151 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*322 OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

We must determine whether there is substantial evidence to support the termination of the claimant’s workers’ compensation benefits. The Commonwealth Court held that there is not. We reverse.

Appellee, Susan Udvari, was employed as a lead flight attendant by Appellant, USAir Inc. On January 15, 1992, Udvari sustained neck and shoulder injuries when an aircraft in which she was working ran into a snow bank while attempting to depart. Pursuant to a notice of compensation payable, Udvari received workers’ compensation benefits. On February 8, 1993, USAir filed a petition…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Williams v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Bloom v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Gumro v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by151 opinions

  1. Hoffmaster v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Senco Products, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Thompson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Elberson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Coyne v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Lewis v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API