Mauney v. Electric Const. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The cause was submitted on motion and merits.
The motion is to strike from the transcript the bill of exceptions, on grounds that (1) it has been altered, amended, or changed since it was signed by the judge presiding, etc.; (2) has been defaced or interlined since it became a part of the record; (3) that said bill of exceptions was neither presented nor tendered to the judge who tried this cause, etc.; and (4) that there has been an alteration of a material part of the bill of exceptions since it became a part of the record.
A bill of exceptions must be tendered by the party supposing himself…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Best Park & Amusement Co. v. RollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Shipp v. SheltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Clinton Mining Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Dwight Mfg. Co. v. WordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Birmingham Ry., Light & Power Co. v. LittletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Birmingham Water Works Co. v. BarksdaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Luther v. LutherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Elder v. Ralls Sanitarium, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Hardy v. City of DothanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- City of Birmingham v. ChamblessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.