Legal Opinion

Elder v. Ralls Sanitarium, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 21, 1929No. 7 Div. 807PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Motion is made to strike the bill of exceptions, based upon the ground it does not disclose a tender hy the party supposing himself to be aggrieved. Section 6432, Code of 1923. The concluding; paragraph containing the trial judge’s approval recited the tender of the bill of exceptions by “defendant” ; and movant insists this error is not self-corrective under the author ity of Mauney v. Electric Const. Co., 210 Ala. 554, 98 So. 874.

Under original consideration the court was of the opinion the Mauney Case was conclusive to such effect, but upon a reconsideration a contrary conclusion has been…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Penry v. DozierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Batterton v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Brewer v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  4. Whaley v. Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Wells Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Gulf Shores v. HARBERT INTERN.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Bailey v. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Montgomery City Lines, Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. A. A. Spurlin, Serviving Parent of Douglas J. Spurlin, a Minor, Deceased, Plaintiffs,-Appellants v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Barnes v. BurkeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API