City of Birmingham v. Chambless
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
Count 1 as amended was not subject to the defendant’s demurrer. It charges that the plaintiff stepped in a hole or depression in the paved part of a street, describing the hole or depression and giving the location, and that, as a proximate cause, she fell down a high terrace to that portion of the street used by vehicles. The negligence charged was in permitting the hole to remain in the street “exposed and unprotected” for more than a year. If the defendant negligently permitted the defect to remain in the street an unreasonable length of time, this would be equivalent to notice. Lord v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Birmingham v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- City of Ensley v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Miller v. Mutual Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Black v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Police Firemen's Ins. Ass'n v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Anniston v. OliverAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
- Ellard v. J. Blach & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Merritt v. CarterAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942