Legal Opinion

City of Birmingham v. Chambless

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 22, 1931No. 6 Div. 705PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

Count 1 as amended was not subject to the defendant’s demurrer. It charges that the plaintiff stepped in a hole or depression in the paved part of a street, describing the hole or depression and giving the location, and that, as a proximate cause, she fell down a high terrace to that portion of the street used by vehicles. The negligence charged was in permitting the hole to remain in the street “exposed and unprotected” for more than a year. If the defendant negligently permitted the defect to remain in the street an unreasonable length of time, this would be equivalent to notice. Lord v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. City of Ensley v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Miller v. Mutual Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Black v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  5. Police Firemen's Ins. Ass'n v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Anniston v. OliverAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Ellard v. J. Blach & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Merritt v. CarterAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API