Legal Opinion

Hardy v. City of Dothan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 14, 1937No. 4 Div. 952PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This is an action on the case by the personal representative of J. L. Hardy against appellees, Jones and the city of Dothan, seeking to recover damages for wrongfully causing Hardy’s death.

The several counts, in substance, aver: That at the time of said death Hardy was an employee of the said Jones, who was then engaged in operating a cotton gin and regularly employed less than 16 persons; that the city of Dothan furnishbd to Jones electric power for the operation of said gin, using and maintaining for such purpose a line of wires leading from its transformer into said gin over…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Holland v. Tenn. Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Langhorne v. SimingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Northern Alabama Railway Co. v. MansellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  4. Ex parte NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  5. Byars v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Dothan v. HardySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Minyard v. Woodward Iron Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1948
  3. Woodward Iron Co. v. MinyardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  4. Hill v. Metal Reclamation, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API