Legal Opinion

Bates v. Glaser

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1924No. 18572PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.

The appellant commenced this action in equity to set aside a judgment entered against her on or about September 30, 1921. The following demurrer was sustained to the third amended complaint :

“1. That several causes of action have been improperly united.
“2. That the action has not been commenced within the time limited by law.
*329“3. That said third amended complaint does not state facts sufficient to entitle plaintiff to the relief sought, or to any relief.”

From judgment of dismissal, this appeal is taken.

On July 12, 1921, respondent commenced an action against appellant and her husband, Norman…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peyton v. PeytonWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Anderson v. BurgoyneWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. State ex rel. Post v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. State ex rel. Boyle v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Long v. EisenbeisWashington Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ware v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Kilbourne v. KilbourneWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Stablein v. StableinWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Aid v. BowermanWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Rennebohm v. RennebohmWashington Supreme Court · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API