Legal Opinion

Long v. Eisenbeis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1898No. 2676PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Jefferson County.—Hon. James G-. McGlintom, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, J.

This is a suit commenced by plaintiffs in the superior court of Jefferson county to correct and amend a judgment and decree rendered in said court on the 31st day of October, 1895, in which action Henry Bash, Susan W. Bash, B. M. Long, Clementine B. Long and Francis L. Bash were plaintiffs, and Charles Eisenbeis and Eate Eisenbeis were defendants. The bill of complaint, which is entitled the petition, sets.forth thirteen findings of fact filed in the original c°ause, the conclusions of law, and decree which is here sought to be vacated. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Ede v. HazenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Doane v. GlennSupreme Court of Colorado · 1872
  4. Wilson v. BoughtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  5. Bank of California v. DyerWashington Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. American Freehold-Land Mortgage Co. of London v. TannerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Anderson v. BurgoyneWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. State ex rel. Prentice v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Bates v. GlaserWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. West Philadelphia Title & Trust Co. v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API