Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Burgoyne

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1910No. 9062PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered April 16, 1910, upon findings in favor of the defendant, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, dismissing an action to reform a judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, C. J.

On the 17th day of September, 1906, A. M. Anderson, husband of the plaintiff, Martha Anderson, made, executed and delivered to the defendant, Burgoyne, his two promissory notes for the sum of $925 and $1,000 respectively, payable on or before March 26, 1907. The *512notes were not paid at maturity, and on the 30th day of April, 1907, Burgoyne instituted an action in the court below against Anderson and wife to recover the amount of the two notes with accrued interest. The complaint alleged that the husband executed the notes on behalf of himself and wife, that the notes constituted a community…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peyton v. PeytonWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Wilson v. HubbardWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State ex rel. Post v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Clark v. EltingeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. McDonough v. CraigWashington Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ruth v. RhodesArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Fisch v. MarlerWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State ex rel. Prentice v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Woste v. RuggeWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Davies v. CareyWashington Supreme Court · 1913

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API