State v. Helow
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*238EDMONDS, P. J.
Defendant appeals an enhanced sentence following a conviction for delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1); ORS 475.996. She assigns as error the trial court’s denial of her motion to suppress. Defendant contends that the opening of a piece of folded paper in her purse exceeded the scope of her consent to search the purse. We affirm.
The specific historical facts surrounding a warrant-less, consensual search are critical in determining whether a search has exceeded its lawful scope. State v. Weaver, 319 Or 212, 214, 874 P2d 1322 (1994). Here, the trial court made…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WeaverOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Amin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. De La RosaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. AtkinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- State v. BAKER/JAYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. LamoreuxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.