Legal Opinion
Wedges/ledges of California, Inc. A California Corporation v. City of Phoenix, Arizona, a Municipality
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 24, 1994No. 92-15847PublishedCited by 269 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants are the manufacturer and former distributors and owners of an arcade “crane” amusement game called “The Challenger.” Soon after such games were first introduced in Phoenix, the City received numerous complaints about the games. The City responded by revoking license tags for some already approved machines and by imposing a blanket ban on new approvals for a period of roughly four and a half months. Appellants sued, claiming that the City’s actions violated their equal protection, procedural due process and substantive due process rights, and seeking…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by269 opinions
- Roy Richard Dittman v. State of California State and Consumer Affairs Agency Medical Board of California Acupuncture Committee and Marilyn NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Armendariz v. PenmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Muin Mustafa v. Clark County School District, Edward Goldman, and Daniel HusseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Veal v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (In Re Veal)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Med Corp., Inc. v. City of Lima and David J. Berger, Both Individually and in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of Lima, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
264 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.