Legal Opinion

Pulaski Rubber Co. v. Rolin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRESON, Justice.

The record in the instant case involves a Workmen’s Compensation proceeding instituted in the Circuit Court of Giles County. The trial court entered judgment in favor of appellee, awarding benefits for 25% permanent partial disability to the right arm.

In the course of this opinion the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court; that is, Thomas A. Rolin, as petitioner, and Pulaski Rubber Company, as defendant.

On March 31, 1971, petitioner filed his complaint. He alleges that on April 28, 1970, he was injured in the course and scope of his employment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. General Motors Corporation v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1960
  2. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance v. CameronTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  3. McKenzie v. Campbell and Dann Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Lunsford v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  5. AC Lawrence Leather Company v. LovedayTennessee Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murray Ohio Manufacturing Company v. VinesTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  2. U. S. Pipe & Foundry Co. v. CarawayTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Smith v. HaleTennessee Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API