Legal Opinion

Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance v. Cameron

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1967PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cbeson

This is a workmen’s compensation proceeding, in which the employer’s insurance carrier appeals from an adverse judgment rendered in the Circuit Court of Cocke County. The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court; that is, plaintiff in error Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance Company as defendant, and defendant in error Andrew Cameron as petitioner.

The petitioner, twenty-four years old at the time of the injury, was in the employ of the White Pine Block and Supply Company, in White Pine, Tennessee. He was cleaning out the inside of a large concrete…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. Campbell and Dann Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Shores v. ShoresTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Lunsford v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  4. F. Perlman & Co. v. EllisTennessee Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hinson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Employers Insurance Co. of Alabama v. HeathTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Holder v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Prost v. City of Clarksville, Police Dept.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Chapman v. Clement Brothers, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API