Legal Opinion

Lunsford v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1949PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

This is a Workmen’s Compensation case. The trial judge found that the employee, Lunsford, was totally and permanently disabled from doing manual labor, but that since the injury, and before the trial of the cause, the employee had been doing work of firing the furnace in the apartment where he lived for which he received *296$25 dollars per month for six months in the year, that this would be considered in relation to the amount that he earned from the employer and that, therefore, the employee had an eighty-five per cent permanent partial disability.

Both parties have appealed. The employer takes…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. HowardTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Crane Enamel Co. v. JamisonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Anderson v. Volz Const. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Johnson v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Lucey Boiler & Manufacturing Corp. v. HicksTennessee Supreme Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lon Cloyd v. Hartco Flooring CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ham v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  3. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance v. CameronTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Doe v. Matthew 25, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
  5. Consolidation Coal Company v. PrideTennessee Supreme Court · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API