Murray Ohio Manufacturing Company v. Vines
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FONES, Justice.
The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the lower court; that is, William Eugene Vines, defendant in error, as plaintiff, and Murray Ohio Manufacturing Company, plaintiff in error, as defendant.
Defendant appeals from an award of 40% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole and a finding that the one-year statute of limitations began to run from the date that a neurosurgeon diagnosed a ruptured disc, rather than the date of the last compensable injury. Other issues raised are that the findings of fact must be disregarded because neither party…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bass v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
- Tennessee Central Railroad v. VanhoyTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
- Hinton v. Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1902
- Craddock's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Imperial Shirt Corporation v. JenkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. MaxCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- Gerdau Ameristeel, Inc. v. Steven RatliffTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Norton Co. v. CoffinTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- Union Carbide Corp., Food Products Division v. CannonTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Reed v. Genesco, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.