Legal Opinion
Harry Deaktor v. Fox Grocery Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation and John F. Fox
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 27, 1973No. 72-1327PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
The basic issue on this appeal is whether plaintiffs’ evidence regarding damages was adequate to support a claim for alleged antitrust violations.
Fox Grocery Company (Fox), franchisor of retail supermarkets doing business under the “Foodland” name in Western Pennsylvania, discussed with Harry Deaktor, an experienced supermarket operator, the possibility of opening a Foodland franchise store, in the Squirrel Hill section of Pittsburgh, under the management of Mr. Deaktor. E. D. Foods, Inc. was formed to operate the proposed supermarket, and in November,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Albrecht v. Herald Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Joseph B. KAUFFMAN Et Al. v. the DREYFUS FUND, INC., Et Al., Investors Diversified Services, Inc., Et Al., AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Farmington Dowel Products Co. v. Forster Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply International, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Arthur H. Pitchford and Pitchford Scientific Instruments Corporation v. Pepi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Edward C. Rea and 22 Ford Inc., a Corporation v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Tunis Bros. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- PAAC v. RizzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.