Legal Opinion
Arthur H. Pitchford and Pitchford Scientific Instruments Corporation v. Pepi, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 14, 1976No. 75-1136 and 75-1137PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, the president of a corporation that deals in scientific instruments and the corporation itself, brought an antitrust suit alleging that the practices of a manufacturer had illegally restricted their business opportunities and ultimately resulted in the termination of the dealership, causing damages to both the corporation and its president. 1 After trial before a jury, a verdict for $825,000 was returned which was trebled by the trial court, and an attorney’s fee was awarded.
The manufacturer brings this appeal, asserting a series of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. Topco Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply International, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Ursic v. Bethlehem MinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- In re Fine Paper Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Prandini v. National Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.