Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Homeowners Ass'n Monte Vista Estates-East

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 5, 2001No. E028566PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.

Defendant homeowners association appeals from a trial court order granting plaintiffs’ request for attorney fees pursuant to Civil Code section 1717.

The case presents for decision the interesting question of whether section 1717, subdivision (b)(2) precludes any award of attorney fees to the prevailing party when the parties sign a settlement agreement which provides that the action will be dismissed after certain actions have been taken.

We hold that a settlement agreement which provides that the trial court will determine the prevailing party in the action,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Xuereb v. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. International Industries, Inc. v. OlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Scott Co. of California v. Blount, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mann v. Quality Old Time Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Holguin v. Dish Network LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Kim v. EUROMOTORS WEST/THE AUTO GALLERYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Butler-Rupp v. LourdeauxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. de la Cuesta v. BenhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API