Legal Opinion

Butler-Rupp v. Lourdeaux

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 2007No. A114667PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SWAGER, J.

Roseanna Lourdeaux and Wallace Lourdeaux (hereafter collectively referred to as appellants) appeal the trial court’s award of attorney fees to Lili Butler-Rupp and Lili Butler Studio, Inc. (hereafter collectively referred to as respondents). The attorney fees at issue were awarded in connection with a prior appeal in which this court ordered the parties to bear their own costs. Appellants claim the lower court was without jurisdiction to award respondents their appellate attorney fees because this court did not make an award of costs. We disagree and affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. White v. Ultramar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Hess v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Frog Creek Partners, LLC v. Vance Brown, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Silverado Modjeska Recreation & Park District v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Westamerica Bank v. Mbg Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Silver Creek, LLC v. BlackRock Realty Advisors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. BergenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API