Legal Opinion
Scherer v. Wahlstrom
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 7, 1958No. 15946PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RENFRO, Justice.
The Service Life Insurance Company filed an interpleader and named as defendants Mrs. Torsten H. Wahlstrom (nee Miriam Amelia Tatom) and William George Scherer and Elva Burnham Scherer.
Miriam Amelia Tatom was named as primary beneficiary, and William George Scherer as contingent beneficiary in Policy No. 66756, issued by Service Company on the life of Paul Burnham Scherer.
Summary judgment was granted in favor of Mrs. Wahlstrom.
Appellants Scherers appealed on three, points: First, the court erred because Miriam Tatom Wahlstrom was made beneficiary by the insured in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McCain v. YostTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Talley v. HowsleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Talley v. HowsleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Le FevreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Farracy v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Service Life Insurance Co. of Fort Worth v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- Tamez v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- Pitts v. AshcraftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Partin v. De CordovaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Fidelity Union Life Insurance Company v. MethvenTexas Supreme Court · 1961
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.