Legal Opinion

Tamez v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided August 26, 1999No. 14-96-1484-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOE L. DRAUGHN, Justice (Assigned).

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in appellants’ suit seeking damages and proceeds from an insurance policy obtained by National Convenience Stores, Inc. on the lives of its officers and employees. In a single point of error, appellants claim the trial court erred in granting appellees’ motions for summary judgment and in denying appellants’ motion for partial summary judgment. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

*14Facts

Appellants are the families of Ramon Tamez and Cheryl McCarty, both deceased. Tamez and McCarty were employees of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Aranda v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Garrison Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Transport Insurance Co. v. FairclothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. McBride v. ClaytonTexas Supreme Court · 1942

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mayo v. Hartford Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Brown & Brown of Texas, Inc. v. Omni Metals, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  3. Waldman v. MainiNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. DeLeon v. Lloyd's London, Certain UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  5. Johnson v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API