Tamez v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOE L. DRAUGHN, Justice (Assigned).
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in appellants’ suit seeking damages and proceeds from an insurance policy obtained by National Convenience Stores, Inc. on the lives of its officers and employees. In a single point of error, appellants claim the trial court erred in granting appellees’ motions for summary judgment and in denying appellants’ motion for partial summary judgment. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
*14Facts
Appellants are the families of Ramon Tamez and Cheryl McCarty, both deceased. Tamez and McCarty were employees of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Aranda v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Garrison Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Transport Insurance Co. v. FairclothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- McBride v. ClaytonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Mayo v. Hartford Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Brown & Brown of Texas, Inc. v. Omni Metals, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
- Waldman v. MainiNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- DeLeon v. Lloyd's London, Certain UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Johnson v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.