Legal Opinion

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Bradshaw

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 11, 1925No. 15853PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. No law of this State imposes upon a railroad engineer an absolute duty to have his engine under such control, when approaching a crossing, that he can bring it to a stop in order to avoid injury to any person at the crossing. No such absolute duty is placed upon him by the provision in the act approved August 19, 1918 (Ga. L. 1918, p. 212; 8 Park’s Code Supp. (1922), § 2677 et seq.), that a railroad engineer “shall otherwise exercise due care in approaching said crossing, in order to avoid doing injury to any person or property which may be on such crossing.” Under the statute it is a jury…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Bugg v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Atkinson v. FountainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Isom v. SchettinoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Georgia Southern & Florida Railroad v. HaygoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. Georgia Northern Railway Co. v. RollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API