Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. Fountain

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1912No. 3448PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action, for damages; from city court of Fitzgerald — Judge Wall.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

1. The charge, considered in its entirety, presented clearly and correctly, and most favorably to the contentions of the defendant, the law applicable to the issues made by the 'pleadings and evidence. Portions of the charge, to which exceptions are taken, when considered separately from the context, contain slight inaccuracies, but could not have confused or misled the jury, and, when considered in connection with the charge as a whole, are without any material error.

2. Persons crossing the track of a railroad, company at a public-road crossing are entitled to the protection of the statutes…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. WaldrupCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API