Legal Opinion

Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. Duncan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 26, 1971No. 45686PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Chief Judge.

1. Defendants’ counsel cross examined the plaintiff on the contents of portions of her pre-trial statement made to the defendants’ claim agent. The cross examination generally took the form of counsel’s quoting the question asked by the claim agent, plaintiff’s answer, and then asking if it was a correct statement. Plaintiff in the main answered affirmatively. On redirect examination, the plaintiff was allowed, over objection, to relate the content of other parts of her statement to the claim agent. The objection made was that this evidence was inadmissi-

ble as it was a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Palmer v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Hardwick v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Wright v. DilbeckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Thomas v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Miller v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Woodard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Woods v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Brannen v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Reliance Insurance v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Barrett v. CharlsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API