Legal Opinion
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Young
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 5, 1965No. 41448, 41471PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frankum, Judge.
1. In their argument before this court respecting their assignment of error on the overruling of their demurrers, counsel for the defendants in error insist only that the general demurrer to count 2 should have been sustained, because they contend that count 2 sets forth and seeks to recover no item of recoverable damages. We think that their contention in this regard is meritorious. It will be seen that the plaintiff’s prayers with respect to count 2 only seek recovery of punitive damages alleged in that count. While the allegations of fact contained in count 2 might be…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. O'BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Southern Railway Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Beverly v. Observer Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Evans v. HensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Chrysler Corp. v. BattenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Cabaniss v. HipsleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Mary Kicklighter v. Nails by Jannee, Inc., Mary Kicklighter v. Nails by Jannee, Inc., and Third-Party v. Kay-See Dental Manufacturing Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Crosby v. Savannah Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers Mutual Casualty Insurance v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.