Bugg v. Cook
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
(After stating the facts.) 1.' The evidence, though in conflict, was sufficient to authorize the verdict. There was positive evidence that the crossing was on a public road. De*118fendant did not rebut this testimony' by- evidence to the contrary. While one of the burdens resting upon the plaintiff in a case of this sort is to prove that the crossing was on a public highway, yet there being positive evidence to this effect which was uncontroverted by other testimony, and to the introduction of which no objection was taken, the verdict will not be set aside because of failure to prove the manner…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Davis v. WhitcombCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. RylesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Larkin v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Wells v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Savannah & Atlanta Railroad v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964