Legal Opinion

Atkins v. . McAden

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1949PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDessy, J.

No attack is made upon the validity of the bonds referred to in this action. The sole question raised is whether or not, under the facts and circumstances disclosed, the Board of Commissioners of Meck-lenburg County has the legal authority to authorize a transfer of funds from the First Ward School project, as requested by the plaintiffs.

We concur in the ruling of the court below in so far as it holds that the purpose for which these funds may be used is the general purpose set forth in the bond order, as provided in G.S. 153-78. The detailed estimates given and the projects described in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. School Commissioners v. Board of Aldermen & TreasurerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Venable v. School Committee of Pilot MountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Board of Education v. . ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Johnson v. . MarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Board of Education v. . PegramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Constantian v. Anson CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Coggins v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Painter v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Teer v. JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Waldrop v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API