Legal Opinion

Board of Education v. . Forrest

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1925PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

From the wording of the judgment we infer his Honor was of opinion that the plaintiff is not entitled to the relief demanded because tbe county board o£ education did not purchase or condemn tbe lot in suit at tbe time title was acquired to tbe five acres. In tbis we think there is error. It was formerly provided (O. S., vol. II, sec. 5416), that tbe county board of education or tbe board of trustees of any incorporated or chartered school district might acquire sites for school buildings by donation or purchase, and not more than two acres by condemnation; and, further, that a proceeding…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McInnish v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. School Committee of Seventy-First Consolidated School District v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Davenport v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Venable v. School Committee of Pilot MountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Pemberton v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Atkins v. . McAdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Painter v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Moore v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Feezor v. SiceloffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Kistler v. Board of Education of Randolph CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API