Legal Opinion
Hanmer v. Wes Barrette Masonry
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 17, 1987No. C8-86-1099Published
1Opinion of the Court
403 N.W.2d 839 (1987)
Craig HANMER, Relator,
v.
WES BARRETTE MASONRY and Lakeland Fire & Casualty, Respondents.
No. C8-86-1099.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
April 17, 1987.
Timothy J. McCoy, Minneapolis, for relator.
David Odlaug, St. Paul, for respondent.
COYNE, Justice.
The Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA), by majority decision, affirmed a compensation judge's denial of benefits for temporary partial disability. We affirm.
Employee, a 29-year-old former professional hockey player, worked as a brick tender for employer Wes Barrette Masonry at a weekly wage of $447.30. He sustained two…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Fryhling v. Acrometal Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Hanmer v. Wes Barrette MasonrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Lemieux v. MortensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Mayer v. Erickson DecoratorsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.