Legal Opinion
Conrad v. Schwendiman
Utah Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 1984No. 18661PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Chief Justice.
The Utah Department of Public Safety revoked plaintiff Robert Conrad’s driver’s license because of his failure to submit to a breathalyzer test pursuant to Utah’s implied consent statute, U.C.A., 1953, § 41-6-44.10. The district court upheld that decision; plaintiff appeals. We affirm.
Plaintiff was stopped by a Salt Lake City police officer because plaintiff was driving his vehicle the wrong way on a one-way street. After detecting a strong odor of alcohol emanating from the plaintiff, the officer asked him to perform field sobriety tests; plaintiff complied. Because of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. GillettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Holman v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Beck v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by18 opinions
- Toby Joseph Welch v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Department of Licensing v. LaxWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Matter of SmithIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. BernhardtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- State v. SuazoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.