Legal Opinion
Vogel v. Corporation Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 13, 1942No. 29592PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is an original action by which petitioner seeks prohibition to stay and stop proceedings against him for contempt pending before the Corporation Commission. In those proceedings petitioner is charged with violation of order No. 13025 of the Corporation Commission, issued under authority of article 2, ch. 59, S. L. 1939, 1 designed to> prevent the sale of inferior petroleum products.
A written accusation in the nature of a citation in the name of the State of Oklahoma was served on petitioner, a bulk station operator and resident of Craig county, wherein there was detailed, under three…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Eilenbecker v. District Court of Plymouth CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Maas v. DunmyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Wilson v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Sharpe v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar AssociationCourt on the Judiciary of Oklahoma · 1968
- School Dist. No. 25 v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Monson v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.