Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Abner v. Elliott

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1999No. 98-1786PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Per curiam

Oral Argument

Appellants request oral argument for this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(2). Among the factors we consider in determining whether to grant oral *16argument under S.CtPrac.R. IX(2) are whether the case involves a matter of great importance, complex issues of law or fact, a substantial constitutional issue, or a conflict between courts of appeals. State ex rel. McGinty v. Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 283, 286, 690 N.E.2d 1273, 1276.

Despite appellants’ contentions to the contrary, oral argument is not warranted here. We recently decided a similar…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nakoff v. Fairview General HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. White v. JunkinOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Clark v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Peyko v. FrederickOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Nix v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kreps v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Citizens for Open, Responsive & Accountable Government v. RegisterOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State ex rel. Shimko v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State ex rel. Dreamer v. MasonOhio Supreme Court · 2007

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API