Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Largent v. Fisher

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1989No. 88-670PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Per curiam

For a writ of prohibition to issue, a relator must ordinarily establish: (1) that the court against whom it is sought is about to exercise judicial power, (2) that the exercise of such power is unauthorized by law, and (3) that, if the writ is denied, he will suffer injury for which no other adequate remedy exists. State, ex rel. Fyffe, v. Pierce (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 8, 9, 531 N.E. 2d 673, 674, citing Commercial Savings Bank v. Wyandot Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1988), 35 Ohio St. 3d 192, 193, 519 N.E. 2d 647, 648-649.

Judge Fisher does not deny that he was about to act with respect to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Adams v. GusweilerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State ex rel. Phillips v. PolcarOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State ex rel. Racing Guild v. MorganOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State Ex Rel. Miller v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Commercial Savings Bank v. Wyandot County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. GwinOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Barclays Bank PLC v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Grandview Hospital & Medical Center v. GormanOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Connor v. McGoughOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State Ex Rel. Csank v. JaffeOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API